Testing

E.Machine · Post by **E.Machine** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:21 pm

Just testing the new sig.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5842

Gaiava Arkkaza · Post by **Gaiava Arkkaza** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:45 pm

Thats totally Sub-Zero style.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5843

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:57 pm

The funny thing is that's not a foul, because he got all ball before contact with the person. xDDDD

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5844

dprantl · Post by **dprantl** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:07 pm

Lymus wrote:The funny thing is that's not a foul, because he got all ball before contact with the person. xDDDD

Haha Lymus that's hilarious. So all I have to do is touch the ball so then I can totally kick the opposing player's ass?

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5854

Death · Post by **Death** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:20 pm

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/76562/alw ... e_of_life/

I love this video. Your sig is in this one. Not to mention some monty python classic tunes

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5856

Finlander · Post by **Finlander** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 8:13 pm

Lymus wrote:The funny thing is that's not a foul, because he got all ball before contact with the person. xDDDD

high foot anyways

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5870

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:28 pm

dprantl wrote:
Lymus wrote:The funny thing is that's not a foul, because he got all ball before contact with the person. xDDDD
Haha Lymus that's hilarious. So all I have to do is touch the ball so then I can totally kick the opposing player's ass?

It's called playing a defender.

But yeah, Fin, it's a high kick I guess. If it was just he knee coming up, no high kick =P

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5872

dprantl · Post by **dprantl** » Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:48 pm

Whether it's a high-kick or whatever, that is called "Dangerous Play" and is automatically a foul. If it was his knee, elbow, hand, etc, it would be no different. You can't just touch the ball and then do whatever you want to the other player. And no, it's not called Defense. Just look how extremely careful defenders are when an attacker is in the penalty box to see how you are really supposed to play.

http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affeder ... e_1581.pdf

"An indirect free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player,
in the opinion of the referee:
• plays in a dangerous manner"

I used to be a referee...

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5874

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:02 am

dprantl wrote:Whether it's a high-kick or whatever, that is called "Dangerous Play" and is automatically a foul. If it was his knee, elbow, hand, etc, it would be no different. You can't just touch the ball and then do whatever you want to the other player. And no, it's not called Defense. Just look how extremely careful defenders are when an attacker is in the penalty box to see how you are really supposed to play.

http://www.fifa.com/mm/document/affeder ... e_1581.pdf

"An indirect free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player,
in the opinion of the referee:
• plays in a dangerous manner"

I used to be a referee...

I typically play a defender. However, now we play a 4-3-3 form and I take up a defensive mid because I'm the only person in my FC club who can actually cross from both sides of the field.

It it's a dangerous play, then shouldn't the referee play advantage? And if the other team gets clear possession of the ball, an indirect kick would be taken from where the foul was commited.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5889

dprantl · Post by **dprantl** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:11 am

Lymus wrote:It it's a dangerous play, then shouldn't the referee play advantage? And if the other team gets clear possession of the ball, an indirect kick would be taken from where the foul was commited.

Yes, that's correct. Although in the sig above, it seems like the player who commited the foul will get possession of the ball, and the other player is going to be carried off on a stretcher.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5891

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:24 am

dprantl wrote:
Lymus wrote:It it's a dangerous play, then shouldn't the referee play advantage? And if the other team gets clear possession of the ball, an indirect kick would be taken from where the foul was commited.
Yes, that's correct. Although in the sig above, it seems like the player who commited the foul will get possession of the ball, and the other player is going to be carried off on a stretcher.

Hey, loose ball. Who knows? Maybe a fellow striker was nearby for a Up-Back-and-Through. =)

And if that was the case, you'd still have to stop the game for subs (both sides in case of an injury, I believe). But that's just how futbol works, I guess.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5892

Dumples · Post by **Dumples** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 8:02 am

This is a great topic now since it makes no sense. hehe

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5898

E.Machine · Post by **E.Machine** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:18 am

Yeah I thought changing the sig again would confuse a lot of people loll.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5900

Red Squirrel · Post by **Red Squirrel** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:30 am

lol this is great. change it to a hockey sig, that will really confused things.

"kicking? in hockey? ouch!"

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5902

Dumples · Post by **Dumples** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:59 am

Red Squirrel wrote:lol this is great. change it to a hockey sig, that will really confused things.

"kicking? in hockey? ouch!"

Leave it to the Canadians to bring up hockey!!!

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5905

E.Machine · Post by **E.Machine** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:59 am

Hockey > Life.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5906

Gaiava Arkkaza · Post by **Gaiava Arkkaza** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:48 pm

E.Machine wrote:Hockey > Life.

You think so? Okay, choose:

Sex, Food, Happyness or Hockey.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5911

Red Squirrel · Post by **Red Squirrel** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 12:59 pm

FOOOOOOD! Nice warm poutine!

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5914

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:01 pm

Gaiava Arkkaza wrote:
E.Machine wrote:Hockey > Life.
You think so? Okay, choose:

Sex, Food, Happyness or Hockey.

UO.

UO=Sex. Duuuuh. : P

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5915

Red Squirrel · Post by **Red Squirrel** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:09 pm

UO > real life > sex

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5917

E.Machine · Post by **E.Machine** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 2:20 pm

Gaiava Arkkaza wrote:
E.Machine wrote:Hockey > Life.
You think so? Okay, choose:

Sex, Food, Happyness or Hockey.

Hockey.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5918

Gaiava Arkkaza · Post by **Gaiava Arkkaza** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 4:09 pm

E.Machine wrote:
Gaiava Arkkaza wrote:
E.Machine wrote:Hockey > Life.
You think so? Okay, choose:

Sex, Food, Happyness or Hockey.
Hockey.

WTF. Lies. *draws his AK47 and starts running after Eby*

YOU BETRAYYYEEEEEEEEERR!!!

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:891, old post ID:5923