Criticize Microsoft, lose your job

This is a catch all off topic forum to talk about anything not covered by other sections.
Locked
User avatar
manadren_it
Posts: 1810
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 6:48 pm

Criticize Microsoft, lose your job

Post by manadren_it »

News.com Link
Report Link


Microsoft critic dismissed by @Stake
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
http://news.com.com/2100-1014-5082649.html

A computer security expert who contributed to a paper deeply critical of Microsoft has been dismissed by his employer, a consulting company that works closely with the software giant.

Dan Geer, a longtime computer security researcher, and several colleagues released a controversial study on Wednesday that called the ubiquity of Microsoft software a hazard to the economy and to national security. Although independently financed and researched, the study was distributed by the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), a Washington-based trade association largely made up of Microsoft's rivals.

Cambridge, Mass-based @Stake, where Geer worked as chief technical officer, said in a statement Thursday that the researcher had not gotten his employers' approval for the study's release, and that he was no longer associated with the company.


"Participation in and release of the report was not sanctioned by @Stake," the security and consulting company said. "The values and opinions of the report are not in line with @Stake's views."

A Microsoft spokesman said the software maker had not pressured @Stake to make any decision on Geer's status. However, @Stake did call Microsoft late Tuesday night (after news of the report's contents first broke) to say that Geer's findings did not reflect his employer's opinions, the spokesman said.

"We had nothing to do with @Stake's internal personnel decision," Microsoft spokesman Sean Sundwell said.

Sundwell said that Microsoft used @Stake's services in developing security software for customers, and that the relationship extended several years back. An @Stake representative declined to comment beyond the contents of the company's statement.

In that statement, @Stake said Geer had not been associated with the company as of Sept. 23, the day before Geer's report (the report co-written by Geer) was actually released.

Security expert Bruce Schneier, another co-author of the report, said Geer had believed he was still employed when the two of them discussed their report on a conference call with reporters on Wednesday.

"When Dan was on the call, he was an employee," said Schneier, who serves as chief technical officer at Counterpane Internet Security. "They might have fired him 10 minutes later, but they didn't tell him."

Geer could not be immediately reached for comment.

The report, entitled "CyberInsecurity: The Cost of Monopoly," said that to rely on a single computing infrastructure such as Microsoft's Windows operating system created unnecessary risks to national infrastructure--particularly given the company's recent history of security flaws. Moreover, new security features being implemented in products by Microsoft simply made the problem worse, by locking customers even more tightly into the company's software, the authors said.

"The focus on Microsoft is simply that the clear and present danger can be ignored no longer," the authors wrote in the report, recommending that the government force the company to open up its technology and allow competing products to interoperate.

Schneier said the idea for the report had come from Geer and the other researchers, not from the CCIA or other Microsoft rivals. The group had found it hard to find other researchers to sign on to the idea, even if those approached agreed with the study's premises, he said.

"When we were conceiving and writing the report, a surprising number of researchers said 'No,' because of the fear of Microsoft," Schneier said. "Dan was not talking for @Stake. We were speaking as researchers. The fact that @Stake couldn't get around that shows the pressure that Microsoft brings to bear."


Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1377, old post ID:11926
mana's blog {1, 2} yell at me when I get lazy
User avatar
Red Squirrel
Posts: 29209
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 12:14 am
Location: Northern Ontario
Contact:

Criticize Microsoft, lose your job

Post by Red Squirrel »

Scarry. Being fired for your own opinion. Maybe it's worth skipping those corporate meetings too. :D

Speaking of MS, I'll be getting contacts shortly and they might send some free stuff so I can review and post new articles. :banana:

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1377, old post ID:11931
Honk if you love Jesus, text if you want to meet Him!
User avatar
rovingcowboy
Posts: 1504
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 10:14 pm

Criticize Microsoft, lose your job

Post by rovingcowboy »

Red Squirrel wrote: Scarry. Being fired for your own opinion. Maybe it's worth skipping those corporate meetings too. :D

Speaking of MS, I'll be getting contacts shortly and they might send some free stuff so I can review and post new articles. :banana:
:banghead:

makes the saying of keeping your mouth shut sound right?? but if you do that only do it until after you quit the job and get all your pay checks. then print it in the paper, and get a job in another field of work like maybe newspaper reporter :D

as for skiping the meetings no need to do that red. just take in a pda and have games on it with no speakers. you can play the games and half listen to the meeting so you will only hear the best parts of the meeting that way. and nobody will be the wiser that you are playing games :banana:

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1377, old post ID:11953
roving cowboy/ keith
Locked