Page 1 of 1

Should I switch to gigabit?

Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 11:26 pm
by Red Squirrel
Here's the latest things I've spent money on so far:

aprox price | item | reason

300$ | barebones system | could not beat the price
200$ | 300GB HDD | MORE MORE MORE space for the server
150$ | 200GB HDD | MORE!!! (for workstation)
40$ | HDD enclosure | can come in handy
750$ | parts for new system, other one fubared up completely
600$ | HDD enclosures/HDD's for my new backup solution

I think I left some things out

Total: too much!

Now convince me to switch to gigabit! That would involve buying two switches, and I think just one nic, since only the server has a 100mbit one. So really we're looking at another 200 bucks. Only. :D

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3574, old post ID:29110

Should I switch to gigabit?

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:02 am
by jryan
Gigabit would offer no advantage other than Local Access. Remember, Red, our Cable internet connects to the computers in timmins at 100MB.. ADSL at 10MB for connection to nic wise. And, our ADSL speeds in Timmins have been bumped to a Whopping 5MB. So you could technically slow down your nic rediculously and not notice a difference.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3574, old post ID:29121

Should I switch to gigabit?

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 11:55 am
by Red Squirrel
Local access is what really counts, otherwise even 10 would be over kill.

With my backup solution I'll put in place, jobs might overlap, but only time will tell, and with rsync it should do fine at 100.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3574, old post ID:29122

Should I switch to gigabit?

Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2005 1:29 pm
by Chris Vogel
If everything is fine at your current speed, I wouldn’t upgrade. I would just save that money. You never know when you may really need it. :)

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3574, old post ID:29123