Page 1 of 1

Large scale data loss

Posted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:36 pm
by Red Squirrel
My PC suddently started acting up, it randomly crashed, mostly during large data transfers. When it did crash, the C drive would corrupt and I'd have to reimage. After about 10 times I concluded there was simply nothing I could do, so I decided that before bed I'd backup my entire D drive to be safe, and order parts to build a new PC from scratch... well hours before I would have started the backup, it crashed, but instead of taking out the C drive, it took out the D drive, and no recovery tool was able to find traces of any files on it. Everything GONE. The crash literally shreded the partition to bits. I've never seen anything like it.

It's not bad memory, it's not the HDD failing, and I'm almost positive it's not the PSU as the voltages are very stable. So I've been without a main machine for a few days while I wait for the new parts to come in. Once they do then I'll keep these as spare and see if I can figure out wtf is wrong with it.

Or I might just put linux and never look back, linux is just like that, it will work, I can almost guarantee it. If it infact does work and lasts for a while I will add in a few 300gig drives and use it as a full backup server. I cannot afford to loose my D drive again and this was a very harsh lesson to do more intensive backups.

Thankfully some data is backed up such as
- documents
- p2p stuff (downloads + shared stuff)
- pictures (backup outdated though :o)
- application data stuff (bookmarks,etc)
- Iceteks and anythingforums (all other sites (customers/misc) are gone though, but less important for me to have anyway)

I lost lot of programs though, I had a directory with tons of standalone programs, some of which are unreplacable, and I can't believe I did not have a backup task for that, but unfortunatly I did not. :(

To make things worse, my PC at work did the EXACT SAME THING, a few weeks before mine did it. Only thing that is similar between the two is that they have a 200GB hard drive with a 20ish GB partition (actually mine was more like 40GB) for OS, and the rest for data. So as the data partition got more full, maybe windows did not like it, or something. On both machines they crashed while large amounts of data was being transfered to the data partition.

It would just BSOD and reboot, and then I'd get "Operating system not found".

Well some of the crashes were slightly slower, what would happen is that individual files on the C drive would become corrupt. So I'd start getting popups "cannot read c:[blah blah] because it is corrupt" and the program associated would just freeze up or close. Then once system programs like explorer would get hit, it would just freeze up and I'd have to hit reset, and then the partition would be missing. When the D drive got taken out, C was 100% healthy afterwards, I could actually boot up and all, but not see the D drive because it was gone.


This is why I have not been around much lately, I'm posting this from what is suppost to be my firewall, but for now that project has been put on hold until I get my mainbox up and running.

What's bothering me is the fact that it happened at work, then at home, and this is a problem that has never happened in history before. Yes it has, but it has a cause, such as a bad hard drive. Just for stats, that HDD was installed maybe like a month before, not even, and it used to be the main data drive in my highly productive intranet server. So if it was dying, it would of been in that server.


So the lesson learnt here is that ALL DATA should be backed up on multiple SYSTEMS.

I think what I'll most likely do is just buy a bunch of 300GB drives and plug them in my external enclosure and do monthly backups, or what not. with a 300GB drive I can most likely backup both workstations, and with another 300GB drive I can backup the whole server, and if I buy a 3rd drive I can just rotate, so when I do another backup, during the process there's still a full backup that exists, in case there happends to be a failure of some sort during that backup.

If I had the money I'd just get a powervult tape drive. but those are VERY expensive! Maybe once I have a full time job and my own house, I'll have my own server room with rackmount toys. :lol:

For now I just have to compromize with what I can afford.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28772

Large scale data loss

Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2005 4:51 pm
by travis
Woah, I have never ever ever heard of something like that happening, while the hdd is still in good condition. That really stinks man, sorry about your loss. Isn't it the worst when you boot up your computer and it says no operating system found? And then you turn it off with sweat running down your forehead and pray it boots back up. Was this the machine you were running 2000 on?

So what are you going to put in your new system?

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28789

Large scale data loss

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 5:56 pm
by Red Squirrel
Yep it's my win2k machine, my main one. At first I was just pist off more then worried because of the fact that it bailed out on me and pulled something off like that. so I reimage, and get back to what I was doing, and 5-10 times it just kept doing the same. then I figured I should back up my D drive but before I got the chance it blew that one away instead...

No chance of recovery now, I tried too many things.

The new system will be an Athlon 64 3200+ with a 120GB sata drive... it seems 200GB drives are hated by windows. The same issue happened on my work machine which also has a 200GB drive partitioned the same way. It was not my main machine at work though, but my test machine so at least it did not affect my work that much, but it did as I had lot of VMs and such.

Hopefully everything comes in tomorow, as it really sucks to be without my main box. I have stuff to burn to CD for the church and was hoping to get that done by the sunday that just past by...

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28794

Large scale data loss

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 6:42 pm
by travis
Yeah that should be a nice machine. Are you going to use 939 or 754? Yeah isnt it like anything over 137 Windows doesnt like?

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28797

Large scale data loss

Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:10 pm
by Red Squirrel
Yeah I think it's the 137GB limit thing that might of did it. My theory is that windows only craps out when any data happends to be written after whateverphysical part of the drive that marks the 137GB spot. Thing is though, whatever triggers that crash, makes it permanent since even after putting a different drive in, the PC was still acting up. I put the image on my 60Gig drive (the drive that used to be in that PC) and it would not even let me boot up, it kept saying it could not find the swap file, and crap like that, but yet that image configuration has worked for years. The swap file is not even customized, it's all default settings. Never really bothered playing with that.

I went with the socket 939, if I remember well.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28798

Large scale data loss

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:12 pm
by travis
Or you could always get two 120 gig drives, and run raid 0?

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28845

Large scale data loss

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:18 pm
by MikeDB
This has happened to me before I like to call it a "CRASH BURN AND GOODBYE!" You basicly have a virus...

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28846

Large scale data loss

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:06 pm
by Red Squirrel
travis wrote: Or you could always get two 120 gig drives, and run raid 0?
Yeah thought of that. But I think what I'd do instead of a raid I'd probably just have rsync do the mirroring, that way it won't only protect me from failure, but also if I do something stupid, or if windows does something stupid. :lol:

But my backup solution will be nice, I will get some removable drive trays and install them either in my server, or my firewall, or build a new PC with the "broken" parts (I bet if I put linux it won't crap out, I'll test it later on) so that way I'll have external backups. And all I have to do is buy new hard drives as I need them. I was going to get a tape drive, but just the drive alone would be more expensive then buying like 5 300GB HDDs.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28849

Large scale data loss

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:43 pm
by travis
Wow, thats expensive. What was your old machine specs? Removable drives are cool, if my dad new about that he'd probably put on in my computer so when i get in trouble, primary hard drive is gone lol.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28852

Large scale data loss

Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 10:23 pm
by Red Squirrel
lol, that's why you keep the key. :D

That's the only thing I'm worried about though, it makes it easier to steal, I'm sure a professional BnE person can figure out those locks like nothing. I could always make it set off some kind of alarm though. and really, if they want it that bad they can just take the whole server. I guess that's when rackmountables come in handy, they're super heavy and bulky to carry.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3537, old post ID:28863