Page 1 of 1

Putting telemarketters on hold

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 8:53 pm
by Red Squirrel
That's my new thing now, when I get a telemarketter, instead of no answering, I'll put them on hold, and put the phone near the speakers and play some midi music. :lol: Record is only like a 30 second wait though, so I'll keep trying. :D

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3340, old post ID:27049

Putting telemarketters on hold

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:20 pm
by Streety
You should try reminding them every 15 seconds or so how 'important their call is to you', not sure it would improve the record much but it's worth a try.

I don't actually bother answering the landline at all at present, if it's someone I actually wish to speak to they'll have my mobile number. Only received one or two unwanted calls in the past year or so on my mobile.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3340, old post ID:27050

Putting telemarketters on hold

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:23 pm
by Red Squirrel
LOL funny since I'm just making a loop mp3 that I'll play, and it will say that every now and then. :D I'll post it once Im done, just some music from UO with some voice produced with a TTS system.

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3340, old post ID:27051

Putting telemarketters on hold

Posted: Fri May 20, 2005 9:45 pm
by Red Squirrel
I wonder how far I'll get with this. :roflmao2: Anyone feel free to steal it to use it too. :P

http://icetekshq.ath.cx:18080/stuff/please_hold.mp3

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3340, old post ID:27052

Putting telemarketters on hold

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 1:19 am
by Triple6_wild
post the time's thay hold for lol

im guessing thay can only wait so long tho like 2 mins max then have to move to another call

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3340, old post ID:27054

Putting telemarketters on hold

Posted: Sat May 21, 2005 5:50 am
by Streety
Not a bad effort, you've managed to retain the annoying factor while boosting the quality. :)

Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:3340, old post ID:27055