animal testing
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2003 10:14 pm
I'm totally against, there are many alternatives and animal test results are usually not accurate.
For example, it takes more nicotine injestion to kill a dog then it does to kill a human. Or some cancer medicine works on rats, but causes tumors in humans, there's a lot more.
Not to mention how cruel it is!
Specific things have been tested in the pass, so they can also use that same data instead of doing it over again.
Sadly, you'd be suprised at how many products get tested on animals. Check on your household products and if it says "imported by procter and gamble" chances are animals went through hell so you can use that product. They even test oven cleaners on animals. It's horrible! It won't do any good either, it's made to clean an oven, not to torture people/animals so there's no use knowing how much fumes it takes to kill a rabbit!
Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1188, old post ID:10425
For example, it takes more nicotine injestion to kill a dog then it does to kill a human. Or some cancer medicine works on rats, but causes tumors in humans, there's a lot more.
Not to mention how cruel it is!
Specific things have been tested in the pass, so they can also use that same data instead of doing it over again.
Sadly, you'd be suprised at how many products get tested on animals. Check on your household products and if it says "imported by procter and gamble" chances are animals went through hell so you can use that product. They even test oven cleaners on animals. It's horrible! It won't do any good either, it's made to clean an oven, not to torture people/animals so there's no use knowing how much fumes it takes to kill a rabbit!
Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1188, old post ID:10425
