RipNet's article about linux vs Windows
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2003 4:49 am
Oh man. I actually gave this piece of garbage a chance since I though that the "new guy" to ripnet, might have something good to say, but instead, I found myself reading the newbie section of Linuxquestions.org. I seriously doubt that the man who wrote that article has ever tried linux and if he has, he has not tried it seriously. Every first sentence of his remarks were the stupidest, cliche things I hear all that time about linux.
How can an OS nagging you about security be something bad? He is a windows user.
If you want to play games, see if they work on linux, if not, why choose linux?
Did he dare mention Dual booting?
I would love to go on, but I would be writing my own article.
and btw, here is my signature:
Is this guy telling me that linux can't run as a primary OS?
Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1134, old post ID:10056
How can an OS nagging you about security be something bad? He is a windows user.
If you want to play games, see if they work on linux, if not, why choose linux?
Did he dare mention Dual booting?
Let me say something here... who doesn't plan for atleast 2-3 hours or more of installing a new OS?JC: When installing a PC the first priority is to get as much working as possible with minimum fuss.
I would love to go on, but I would be writing my own article.
and btw, here is my signature:
Code: Select all
[wldkos@localhost wldkos]$ uptime
04:47:39 up 22 days, 11:08, 3 users, load average: 0.64, 0.41, 0.41
Archived topic from Iceteks, old topic ID:1134, old post ID:10056