Page 1 of 1
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:37 pm
by Nosferatu
i had to it was just pretty funny
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28508
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:39 pm
by Shai'tan
LOL
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28509
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:47 pm
by Death
Nosferatu wrote:
i had to it was just pretty funny
Fail + Fail = Epic Fail
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28512
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:51 pm
by Nosferatu
*anticipating red's response (aka waiting on an explination of how this happens ) * hahaha
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28513
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:52 pm
by Death
Nosferatu wrote:*anticipating red's response (aka waiting on an explination of how this happens ) * hahaha
Well you see........when an application and a division by zero exception love each other very much.....
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28514
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:54 pm
by Nosferatu
LOL
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28515
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:30 am
by Red Squirrel
Microsoft fails at failing all the time.
I think that one is photoshopped, but here's a few real ones:
Uhh, what?
Very helpful, thanks ms!
o rly?
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28533
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:29 am
by Nosferatu
LOLOLOOL
omg i love all 3 of those!
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28538
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:37 am
by Dollpartz
lol this thread delivers
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28547
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:23 am
by ggkthx
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28552
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:36 am
by Nosferatu
ggkthx wrote:
LOL
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28553
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:56 am
by onykage
Lets see umm...
Red Squirrel wrote:Microsoft fails at failing all the time.
I think that one is photoshopped, but here's a few real ones:
Uhh, what?
Very helpful, thanks ms!
o rly?
The first one is what you get when the dvd is scratched or that proprietary "unzip" application coughed up a hair ball.
The second one, .. Im not sure looks like something from somekind of domain manager program installation, like Apache for Windows.
The third one, I got no idea...
Nosferatu wrote:
i had to it was just pretty funny
This is classic, thats the Bluescreen screen saver, It looks like your machine bluescreens then it does a fake reboot with the bios then the loading windows thing, then it bluescreens again. It could be a chop, but id be willing to bet thats a screensaver fail.
Its all still epic tho. thats why I use a Mac, unless forced to use windows to host a development uo environment
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28555
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:28 pm
by Kwan
This is an old error I got one day while looking at a log file from IRC:
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28564
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:18 pm
by Red Squirrel
Kwan wrote:This is an old error I got one day while looking at a log file from IRC:
That is epic lol. Not only is microsoft showing it's lack of efficiency, but it's basically telling that your spelling sucks so bad that it wont even bother displaying all the errors.
As for the errors I posted, this is what they are:
1: windows 7 install with no DVD inserted
2: Active directory setup wizard, on a fresh install of win2k3 (I tried it again then it worked lol)
3: Microsoft system center operations manager 2007 (note: this app is suppose to keep track of your network servers and report errors, yet, the program itself crapped out LOL)
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28575
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 5:53 pm
by onykage
As for the errors I posted, this is what they are:
1: windows 7 install with no DVD inserted
HA! I was right.
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28578
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 6:05 pm
by Red Squirrel
What's funny about windows vista and windows 7 is you actually need drivers for the cdrom drive. wtf thought of that? So it boots up half way, then suddenly it needs drivers, if it can't find them, it can't find the cd since it can't reconize the cdrom anymore.
Yet, windows 98, 2k, xp, even me, will find a newer cdrom just fine. It booted off it, it better find it! lol
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28580
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:31 pm
by Dollpartz
Windose > Linux btw, just because you need a degree to work linux.
I'll agree vista sucks ass, whenever I want to do something it will ask me if I'm really sure I want to do this, I say yes I'm sure, then it tells me I don't really want to do this but want to do that instead.
*bangs head against the desk*
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28591
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 8:51 pm
by Kwan
Red Squirrel wrote:What's funny about windows vista and windows 7 is you actually need drivers for the cdrom drive. wtf thought of that? So it boots up half way, then suddenly it needs drivers, if it can't find them, it can't find the cd since it can't reconize the cdrom anymore.
Yet, windows 98, 2k, xp, even me, will find a newer cdrom just fine. It booted off it, it better find it! lol
I was installing some Linux OS on my sisters lap top and got that same error. I can't reamber what distro but i was saying the same thing. You just loaded off the mother trucking thing go back 2 steps and see what you did there you stupid fricken peace of crap.
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28593
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 9:49 pm
by Red Squirrel
Dollpartz wrote:Windose > Linux btw, just because you need a degree to work linux.
I'll agree vista sucks ass, whenever I want to do something it will ask me if I'm really sure I want to do this, I say yes I'm sure, then it tells me I don't really want to do this but want to do that instead.
*bangs head against the desk*
Linux is very frustrating when you don't know much about it, because the obvious stuff is not so obvious, and hard to find any good docs on. But once you do get to know it, it's a great OS, at least for servers. I'm not really ready to use it as my desktop yet, though I always consider it and eventually I want to switch. Probably after the shard revamp I'll work on switching.
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28596
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:02 pm
by dprantl
Red Squirrel wrote:What's funny about windows vista and windows 7 is you actually need drivers for the cdrom drive. wtf thought of that? So it boots up half way, then suddenly it needs drivers, if it can't find them, it can't find the cd since it can't reconize the cdrom anymore.
Yet, windows 98, 2k, xp, even me, will find a newer cdrom just fine. It booted off it, it better find it! lol
The problem with that is it uses different (low-level) drivers or even uses BIOS emulation to boot from the CD. Then when it runs its own environment, it needs its own drivers to interface with its kernel. I believe all the Windows OSes that do not run on top of DOS need to do this. Even Windows 95 had its own drivers, but it could run drives in "compatibility mode", which just meant using the DOS/BIOS instead, but that was much slower.
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28600
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:07 pm
by onykage
Dollpartz wrote:Windose > Linux btw, just because you need a degree to work linux.
I'll agree vista sucks ass, whenever I want to do something it will ask me if I'm really sure I want to do this, I say yes I'm sure, then it tells me I don't really want to do this but want to do that instead.
*bangs head against the desk*
nah, you dont need a degree for linux. Any postix environment is actually really easy to use and not that hard to setup, granted you do have some basic working knowledge of a computer system.
I mean there are so many vanilla flavors of nix out now that install and configure themselves that nix is easy like Betty Crocker. I mean its not like your tring to learn and install BEOS or BSD.
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28601
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:17 pm
by dprantl
onykage wrote:Dollpartz wrote:Windose > Linux btw, just because you need a degree to work linux.
I'll agree vista sucks ass, whenever I want to do something it will ask me if I'm really sure I want to do this, I say yes I'm sure, then it tells me I don't really want to do this but want to do that instead.
*bangs head against the desk*
nah, you dont need a degree for linux. Any postix environment is actually really easy to use and not that hard to setup, granted you do have some basic working knowledge of a computer system.
I mean there are so many vanilla flavors of nix out now that install and configure themselves that nix is easy like Betty Crocker. I mean its not like your tring to learn and install BEOS or BSD.
Actually, BeOS wasn't too bad at all. Whatever happened to that OS...
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28604
Fail? LOL
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 11:36 pm
by mericles69
awsome
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:28613
Fail? LOL
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 10:56 pm
by fljaweiu
has anyone found out any more details, seems valve are still pretty tight lipped on the subject
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:4434, old post ID:34942