Page 1 of 1

Broaderband

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:24 pm
by Chris Vogel
I have Bellsouth FastAccess DSL Lite! Yeah, it’s only 256 kbps downstream and 128 kbps upstream, but it’s a step up! I’m excited about being able to use the phone at the same time and having an always-on connection.

My experiences so far:<ul><li>Cost: Bellsouth Fastaccess DSL Lite is advertised as US$24.95 a month. There is a US$2.97 Regulatory Cost Recovery Fee as well. Considering that we were paying for Bellsouth Internet Call Waiting on top of our dial-up, DSL Lite is only a tiny, tiny bit more expensive. We will get the DSL “modem” free as long as we stay for twelve months. We will have to pay 50% of it (US$37.50) if we only stay for six months. I hate commitments, but I feel pretty safe with this one. I can return the “modem” within thirty days and back out of the agreement if the service is just absolutely horrible. (By the way, the “modem” is a Westell 6100 with a few changes from Bellsouth. It’s a router with NAT and other acronyms. I guess I have to learn about those now.)</li><li>Installation: I ordered DSL through the Internet on the eighth of February, it was activated on the ninth, and I received my equipment on the tenth. Bellsouth said I would have it by the fourteenth. (Bellsouth has always been very prompt in my experience.) Of course, I connected it via ethernet instead of USB. The installation CD-ROM is not required. If I would have remembered that I disabled the DHCP service a long time ago, installation would have been quick and painless.</li><li>DNS: The DNS servers that were assigned to me were performing terribly yesterday. It took seconds to look something up. Unfortunately, this seems to be an ongoing problem. I’m using a third-party DNS server at the moment.</li><li>Speed: Bellsouth FastAccess DSL Lite is advertised as 256 kbps downstream and 128 kbps upstream. My throughput is 216 kbps downstream and 109 kbps upstream according to multiple online tests. I imagine it’s close enough to the advertised speeds once you consider the overhead. I have a downstream signal-to-noise ratio of 31.0 dB (upstream is 26.0 dB) and downstream line attenuation of 35.5 dB (upstream is 23.0 dB). What I’ve read seems to suggest that those are okay numbers. The DSLAM (I think that’s what you call it) is about 800 metres away.</li></ul>
I think I will be content with DSL Lite. Of course, if my parents ever want to upgrade, I certainly won’t object. :)

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45756

Broaderband

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:20 pm
by 000
So a 256/128 connection should give you an actual download speed of 32kbs and an actual upload speed of 16kbs.
Beats the crap out of the usual 5kbs download speed that you usually get out of a 56k dialup connection.
I just got DSL recently and love it.
;)

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45761

Broaderband

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 6:52 pm
by Chris Vogel
0 wrote: So a 256/128 connection should give you an actual download speed of 32kbs and an actual upload speed of 16kbs.
Beats the crap out of the usual 5kbs download speed that you usually get out of a 56k dialup connection.
I just got DSL recently and love it.
;)
Yes, but I realistically get around 27 kB/s. To be honest, I didn’t actually mind dial-up speeds that much. I just left it on overnight (or over multiple nights) for big files. (I once downloaded a Linux distribution that way.) What really got me is disconnecting because someone needed the phone and reconnecting an hour later when the conversation finally finished. :angry:

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45762

Broaderband

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 10:25 pm
by Red Squirrel
Go with broadband, and never look back. :D

I'm suprised they even still offer dialup these days.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45763

Broaderband

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 2:29 am
by VictorEM83
I get 500-600KBps off my 6Mbps cable connection if I have a source that can handle it

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45768

Broaderband

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2006 7:02 pm
by Red Squirrel
my adsl is *suppost* to be 5mbps, but I'm lucky if I get over 1 :P

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45779

Broaderband

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 3:01 pm
by Stasi
Maybe you're going over threshold too quickly. With Cableone, I get 5Mbps, but if I download more than x number of megs in the space of two hours, it drops to 1Mbps until the threshold for the next hour or two isn't surpassed.

... I know this only because I had to re-read their terms of service since I bought a new cable modem yesterday. I hadn't ever noticed a tight cap after reaching the supposed threashold of ~380MB though.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45798

Broaderband

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2006 3:40 pm
by Red Squirrel
No it's unlimited, thank goodness, I hate those limited ones, I find that stupid that some ISPs have a threshold.

Odly enough, the business package they have does have a threshold. The whole point of the business package is to be able to servers, but if you have a threshold, you can't really do that.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:45799

Broaderband

Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2006 12:41 pm
by Chris Vogel
I upgraded to FastAccess DSL Xtreme a few days ago! It’s 3 Mbps down and 384 kbps up. I downloaded OpenOffice.org at about 370 kB/s, which converts to a rounded 2.89 Mbps.

I like it.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:49868

Broaderband

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:15 pm
by Minnie
:dance: Your cruisin now!!

I remember when you were on dial up.. :lol: We use to tease you. :P

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:49905

Broaderband

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 11:21 pm
by Red Squirrel
Haha nice! Still having DNS issues? My ISP's DNS servers are ubber slow, I just use the root servers. :D I'd like to make a true caching server (one that permanently keeps the records to disk until the ttl expires) but can't seem to figure out how to set that up.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:50023

Broaderband

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 3:52 pm
by Chris Vogel
Red Squirrel wrote: Haha nice!  Still having DNS issues?  My ISP's DNS servers are ubber slow, I just use the root servers. :D  I'd like to make a true caching server (one that permanently keeps the records to disk until the ttl expires) but can't seem to figure out how to set that up.
I don’t think so. I’ve not measured how long it actually takes for my primary DNS server to look something up, but here’s the result of a ping:
Terminal wrote: chris@chris-desktop:~$ ping -c 20 205.152.37.23
PING 205.152.37.23 (205.152.37.23) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=17.6 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=25.3 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=18.5 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=17.9 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=18.5 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=19.2 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=17.6 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=18.0 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=17.1 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=18.3 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=11 ttl=58 time=17.5 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=18.2 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=17.8 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=14 ttl=58 time=18.9 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=15 ttl=58 time=17.1 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=16 ttl=58 time=17.6 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=17 ttl=58 time=17.2 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=18 ttl=58 time=17.2 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=19 ttl=58 time=18.3 ms
64 bytes from 205.152.37.23: icmp_seq=20 ttl=58 time=17.6 ms

--- 205.152.37.23 ping statistics ---
20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19075ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.120/18.305/25.324/1.709 ms
Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:50316

Broaderband

Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:58 pm
by Red Squirrel
Woah that is ubber sweet!

I was going to check what my ISP's DNS pings at, but ping aint working right now for some reason, think they blocked it. I know they blocked traceroute...

My current DNS is fast though. :D


C:Documents and Settings
yan.DESTROYER>ping 10.1.1.10

Pinging 10.1.1.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 10.1.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.1.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.1.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 10.1.1.10: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64

Ping statistics for 10.1.1.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms

C:Documents and Settings
yan.DESTROYER>


But that DNS still needs to query the root servers, but it does cache IPs for a bit, though I want to improve that...

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:2657, old post ID:50317