Formally anythingforums.com, iceteks.com, uovalor.com and uogateway.com Forums.
https://www.anyf.ca/
Cicero wrote: The title describes what the thread is.
If your dirty mind is thinking other things then thats your problem
I'm just surpirsed that red didn't post this one.How old are they?Bookworm wrote: I just recently told my niece and nephew to visit this site. With the current thread titles we have, I'm starting to regret that.
Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:1940, old post ID:28487G:"General Audiences-All Ages Admitted."
This is a film which contains nothing in theme, language, nudity and sex, violence, etc. which would, in the view of the Rating Board, be offensive to parents whose younger children view the film. The G rating is not a "certificate of approval," nor does it signify a children's film.
Some snippets of language may go beyond polite conversation but they are common everyday expressions. No stronger words are present in G-rated films. The violence is at a minimum. Nudity and sex scenes are not present; nor is there any drug use content.
PG:"Parental Guidance Suggested. Some Material May Not Be Suitable For Children."
This is a film that clearly needs to be examined or inquired into by parents before they let their children attend. The label PG plainly states that parents may consider some material unsuitable for their children, but the parent must make the decision.
Parents are warned against sending their children, unseen and without inquiry, to PG-rated movies.
The theme of a PG-rated film may itself call for parental guidance. There may be some profanity in these films. There may be some violence or brief nudity. But these elements are not deemed so intense as to require that parents be strongly cautioned beyond the suggestion of parental guidance. There is no drug use content in a PG-rated film.
The PG rating, suggesting parental guidance, is thus an alert for examination of a film by parents before deciding on its viewing by their children.
Obviously such a line is difficult to draw. In our pluralistic society it is not easy to make judgments without incurring some disagreement. So long as parents know they must exercise parental responsibility, the rating serves as a meaningful guide and as a warning
PG-13:"Parents Strongly Cautioned. Some Material May Be Inappropriate For Children Under 13."
PG-13 is a sterner warning to parents to determine for themselves the attendance in particular of their younger children as they might consider some material not suited for them. Parents, by the rating, are alerted to be very careful about the attendance of their under-teenage children.
A PG-13 film is one which, in the view of the Rating Board, leaps beyond the boundaries of the PG rating in theme, violence, nudity, sensuality, language, or other contents, but does not quite fit within the restricted R category. Any drug use content will initially require at least a PG-13 rating. In effect, the PG-13 cautions parents with more stringency than usual to give special attention to this film before they allow their 12-year-olds and younger to attend.
If nudity is sexually oriented, the film will generally not be found in the PG-13 category. If violence is too rough or persistent, the film goes into the R (restricted) rating. A film's single use of one of the harsher sexually-derived words, though only as an expletive, shall initially require the Rating Board to issue that film at least a PG-13 rating. More than one such expletive must lead the Rating Board to issue a film an R rating, as must even one of these words used in a sexual context. These films can be rated less severely, however, if by a special vote, the Rating Board feels that a lesser rating would more responsibly reflect the opinion of American parents.
PG-13 places larger responsibilities on parents for their children's moviegoing. The voluntary rating system is not a surrogate parent, nor should it be. It cannot, and should not, insert itself in family decisions that only parents can, and should, make. Its purpose is to give prescreening advance informational warnings, so that parents can form their own judgments. PG-13 is designed to make these parental decisions easier for films between PG and R.
R:"Restricted, Under 17 Requires Accompanying Parent Or Adult Guardian."
In the opinion of the Rating Board, this film definitely contains some adult material. Parents are strongly urged to find out more about this film before they allow their children to accompany them.
An R-rated film may include hard language, tough violence, nudity within sensual scenes, drug abuse or other elements or a combination of some of the above, so that parents are counseled, in advance, to take this advisory rating very seriously. Parents must find out more about an R-rated movie before they allow their teenagers to view it.
NC-17:"No One 17 And Under Admitted."
This rating declares that the Rating Board believes that this is a film that most parents will consider patently too adult for their youngsters under 17. No children will be admitted. NC-17 does not necessarily mean "obscene or pornographic" in the oft-accepted or legal meaning of those words. The Board does not and cannot mark films with those words. These are legal terms and for courts to decide. The reasons for the application of an NC-17 rating can be violence, sex, aberrational behavior, drug abuse or any other elements which, when present, most parents would consider too strong and therefore off-limits for viewing by their children.
The niece is an adult, and the nephew is 15. It's not the ages I'm worried about; it's the impression they might get about what kind of forum their Uncle Bookworm is recommending if they just look at the titles and not the actual threads. I'd say the forum is probably PG-13, but those titles are looking a bit R (or worse )
The niece is an adult, and the nephew is 15. It's not the ages that I'm worried about; it's the perception they might have about the kind of forum that their Uncle Bookworm is recommending. I'd say that the forum is probably PG-13, but those thread titles sure look like R (or worse0 wrote:How old are they?Bookworm wrote: I just recently told my niece and nephew to visit this site. With the current thread titles we have, I'm starting to regret that.
).There's been A rift in the space-time continuum. Quick, to the escape pods.Cicero wrote: Am I in a time warp or something? How come 000 already had Bookworms post before it was posted?
I'm scared.
I had posted it, and then saw that I had the quote box messed up (it was saying "quote" instead of making the box), so I redid the whole post (I didn't even remember exactly what I had written the first time), but 000 was a faster replier than I was a deleter.Cicero wrote: Am I in a time warp or something? How come 000 already had Bookworms post before it was posted?
I'm scared.
He's lying. He's bending time and space.Bookworm wrote:
I had posted it, and then saw that I had the quote box messed up (it was saying "quote" instead of making the box), so I redid the whole post (I didn't even remember exactly what I had written the first time), but 000 was a faster replier than I was a deleter.
