Anything Forums

http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf
http://www.policestate21.com/

This is truely something hard to grasp because I "knew" for sure it was a plane, simply because the media coverage and the one single video I seen, which does "look" like a plane. (but it's very choppy)

But... what if... those 2 site are right? The facts are really interesting and convincing. I'm really not sure what to believe, but I really wonder why the FBI did in fact confiscate all the videos (try searching kazaa for them... you won't find any, but you'll find plenty of the WTC)

What do you guys think?




Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10529

All these facts are really convincing, but it's just too hard to grasp the fact that they may be true.

I went back to that video (one of the only ones out there) and it seems strange since the explosion happends before the plane actually hits, and if you notice the shadow of the plane, once the plane is gone, the shadow remains. while you could argue that it's the shadow of the explosion, notice the direction of the other shadows, which would cause the shadow of the explosion to be closer to the camera. But the video is not clear so it's really hard to pin point these type of things.

http://www.iceteks.com/misc/pentagon.avi but see for yourself.

Of course this could be an edited version of the real one to try and stir the conspiricy. I really don't know.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10532

Interesting but i'm not sure how true they are. There was tons of rumors and fake pics after 9/11.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10533

Vids don't work.....

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10534

I'm not entirely sure why everybody is making a big fuss about the conspiracy involving the pentagon being hit by a plane. Most people I ask, in fact, never heard about the pentagon and the plane that 'landed' in it's front yard . Most conspiracy theories I read about involve the WTC.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10535

Yeah but thing with the WTC there's too many vids out there that show what really happened, while the pentagon, there's like maybe 1 or 2 out there.... but it's also in a more isolated area.... so they could of simply said that the FBI confiscated all the videos, when really, there was no videos at all, but the security camera.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10536

I still think the Pannidos are behind all of this

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10537

What exactly happened in the vid?

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10538

That's the thing... either there never was any vids (no cameras around to film it at the time... it was only 1 plane, while the wtc was more then one so people were starting to film the smoke and caught the other plane)

OR the conspiricy is true, and that the FBI confiscated the vids (security cameras at gas stations etc).

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10540

I saw it live, I'm pretty sure the conspiracy would take place afterwards, too many people saw it for this to work.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10580

Here it is: Actual footage that proves the pannido's dastardly involvement with the attack on the Pentagon!
(You need Divx to see this eye-opening breathtaking video I produced )

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10592

MrSelf wrote: I saw it live, I'm pretty sure the conspiracy would take place afterwards, too many people saw it for this to work. 

That's what I figured, I'm sure some pentagon workers saw it, felt it nd heard that it was a plane. Suposly soene from ere saw it, but I never talkde to the person or anything.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10594

man, I should not post when it's 7:00am like that. I don't even remember making that post. somehow, it makes sense, sort of.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10772

I thought all the typos gave it character

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10780

Red Squirrel wrote: man, I should not post when it's 7:00am like that.  I don't even remember making that post.  somehow, it makes sense, sort of.

Yeah, I understood it, all I had to do was look at the time posted and translate appropriatly...

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:10929

Great another site, this time they're saying the WTC had bombs

http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/awtc.htm

Thing is, there must be a reason why there's so many of these sites, or it could be a bunch of people that got together to make those things up. But the facts seem so accurate, but so does the facts that go against.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11106

Look, man, look at my video. THE PANNIDOS DID IT! They're deliciously evil

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11111

"...cutting through the WTC like a knife through bread..."

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11117

Red Squirrel wrote: http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf
http://www.policestate21.com/

This is truely something hard to grasp because I "knew" for sure it was a plane, simply because the media coverage and the one single video I seen, which does "look" like a plane.  (but it's very choppy)

But... what if... those 2 site are right?  The facts are really interesting and convincing.  I'm really not sure what to believe, but I really wonder why the FBI did in fact confiscate all the videos (try searching kazaa for them... you won't find any, but you'll find plenty of the WTC)

What do you guys think?

You should probably also know that the United States Air Force could have stopped the planes from pwning those towers, after all, they shot down another aircraft full of civilians and a few terrorists:

[quote=-> Was Flight 93 Shot Down?
Comment: In the end, Flight 93 was ONLY 15.6 minutes away at 500mph (speeds from 400 to 600 were reported) from D.C. when it crashed.

Think about this - in order for us to NOT have intercepted Flight 93, fighters would have had to wait until nearly 10am before turning towards it. The 3 fighters (take your pick) that arrived over D.C. at 9:40am proceeded to do something else over D.C. for 15]</div><!--QuoteEEnd-->

God bless america(?)



Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11366

William Wallace wrote: You should probably also know that the United States Air Force could have stopped the planes from pwning those towers, after all, they shot down another aircraft full of civilians and a few terrorists:

Flight 93 may well have been shot down, but to imply that not shooting down the first two planes that hit the WTC was deliberate is rediculous.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11436

Stasi wrote:

William Wallace wrote: You should probably also know that the United States Air Force could have stopped the planes from pwning those towers, after all, they shot down another aircraft full of civilians and a few terrorists:

Flight 93 may well have been shot down, but to imply that not shooting down the first two planes that hit the WTC was deliberate is rediculous.

Hey, if he lied about the WMDs, how do you know he didn't just sit there and let people die?

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11443

William Wallace wrote:

Stasi wrote:

William Wallace wrote: You should probably also know that the United States Air Force could have stopped the planes from pwning those towers, after all, they shot down another aircraft full of civilians and a few terrorists:

Flight 93 may well have been shot down, but to imply that not shooting down the first two planes that hit the WTC was deliberate is rediculous.

Hey, if he lied about the WMDs, how do you know he didn't just sit there and let people die?

Lying and killing people for the hell of it are two different things

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11475

William Wallace wrote:

Stasi wrote:

William Wallace wrote: You should probably also know that the United States Air Force could have stopped the planes from pwning those towers, after all, they shot down another aircraft full of civilians and a few terrorists:

Flight 93 may well have been shot down, but to imply that not shooting down the first two planes that hit the WTC was deliberate is rediculous.

Hey, if he lied about the WMDs, how do you know he didn't just sit there and let people die?

You are assuming that he lied. He was definitely mistaken, but a lot more people than just President Bush believed the WMDs existed. And what purpose would he have had for letting people die? Just a rousing bit of morning fun, I suppose.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11476

Bookworm wrote: You are assuming that he lied. He was definitely mistaken, but a lot more people than just President Bush believed the WMDs existed.

Exactly

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11478

Bookworm wrote: You are assuming that he lied. He was definitely mistaken, but a lot more people than just President Bush believed the WMDs existed. And what purpose would he have had for letting people die? Just a rousing bit of morning fun, I suppose.

BEEP! BEEP! BEEP! LOSER

Wrong. Bush FED that idea to people and they gobbled it up. No one believed that until Bush pulled it out of the wazoo and told you that.

Also, soldiers are dying every day because of your precious war.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:939, old post ID:11698