overpowred weapons
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 4:17 pm
As i said "When it comes to weps" iam aware what archers are capable of doing, i am still talking about the situation void vs apocalypticadprantl wrote:Sure, no animosity here, just a discussion.Finlander wrote:well whats the profit to be pure archer when it comes to weps if mage can use same wep?dprantl wrote:Sure, that's just fine. But since it doesn't stop any other template from using it, I don't see any problem there. If spellchanneling meant it could only be used by mages, then there would be a problem...
And yes the sc is a problem since it can be used by mages also, and its better than the bows what mages cannot use, it makes absolutly no sence at all when you think of it
and this is what i think, you can think whatever you want but this is my oppinion, and iam not talking about sc weapons in general iam talking about the void vs apocalyptica
So what's the profit to be an archer? Max stamina regen, max stamina, max HCI. A mage will never have this. Archer will *always* shoot much faster than a mage, and will usually hit more often. For a mage to match this they will have to sacrifice some parts of being a mage. That's why The Void has HCI. In a damage comparison over a set period of time from a mage shooting an Apocalyptica vs an archer shooting The Void, the archer will win because he shoots faster and hits more often.
Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:313, old post ID:1589