Page 2 of 2

Cloning

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:44 pm
by MrSelf
shenbaw wrote: It's funny, when most people use the word "mutations" they automatically think of grossly deformed or disfigured things, so much so that it might make something like an apple, inedible or dangerous to eat. No one ever thinks of the mutated apple that is 10 x's bigger and juicier that can feed an entire family for a week.  :lol: Either way, I don't see how cloning apples or fruit could run the risk of "dangerous" mutations. All they're doing is taking the DNA that exists and replicating it. If anything, I would think that would mean they are at less risk for genetic mutations. Am I missing something here???  :(
It's the same thing our body does, only we are guiding the replication instead of our body, and that's where the problem is. As of now, we don't know all the details to how everything works in our body and our body has a better track record at successful replication. That's not to say that we can't discover all the details to replication and figure out how to do it better than what's built into our bodies natural process. I want one of those 10X larger steaks! :moo:

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:8542

Cloning

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2004 10:19 pm
by Red Squirrel
mutation is blasphemy. :P

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:8557

Cloning

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2004 10:03 am
by shenbaw
Red Squirrel wrote: mutation is blasphemy.  :P
So's this, "God, that was an absolutely pointless post." :P

:lol:

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:8579

Cloning

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 7:31 pm
by muppetmayhem
Are we talking about animal cloning? or are we talking about human cloning. animal cloniong is alright, only if we use it to re-build endangered speceis. Human cloning is bad because we are already struggling to keep this world in balance. We wouldn't want to over throught the people population for something as simple as cloning. Although I did wish that i had a twin!

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:8913

Cloning

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:13 am
by shenbaw
muppetmayhem wrote: Are we talking about animal cloning? or are we talking about human cloning.
I think we're just talking about cloning in general.Image
muppetmayhem wrote: animal cloniong is alright, only if we use it to re-build endangered speceis.
Why is that the only acceptable purpose?
muppetmayhem wrote: Human cloning is bad because we are already struggling to keep this world in balance. We wouldn't want to over throught the people population for something as simple as cloning.
:huh: Come again? Over what the people population? For something as simple as cloning? :wacko:

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:8979

Cloning

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 4:41 am
by Anonymous
I say yay for cloning and yay for designer babies.

Hell, if cloning is allowed, I'm going to make an army of myself. Now that would be fun.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:10471

Cloning

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 9:10 am
by sintekk
William Wallace wrote: I say yay for cloning and yay for designer babies.

Billion doller babies! Woo! :lol:

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:10480

Cloning

Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 3:58 pm
by Anonymous
sintekk wrote:
William Wallace wrote: I say yay for cloning and yay for designer babies.

Billion doller babies! Woo! :lol:
And 100 sintekks to use as man whores! w00t! :banana:

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:620, old post ID:10507