Stasi wrote: Again, laws exist to deter or allow the society to penalize those who break them. I can guarantee you that there are people who drive 50mph in 25mph zones.
Of course there is a real risk to driving 50 in a 25, one that can't really be eliminated without putting 10 walls around all roads and only letting 1 person drive on them at a time. With prostitution however, again if properly regulated legal prostitution would nearly eliminate the risk involved, and I say legal, as I'm assuming an unliscensed hoe walking the streets would still be illegal.
But now we're back to that victimless crime issue again. You call prostitution undigified and self-demeaning, but have you ever considered that some prostitutes may not view it that way? Sure there are those who, because of circumstances beyond thier control, were forced into prostitution, or felt as so. But it's rather of you to say that the profession is self-demeaning without considering that there may be those who don't feel demeaned in any way. And that it is undignified is a view that may not be shared by a majority. You say that laws exist to deter and punish immorality, but it's rather arrogant of you to assume that your definition of immorality is universal. Rather arrogant of anyone actually. That is why moral issues shouldn't be taken lightly, so quickly assumed and accepted, without taking into consideration differing points of view. However in cases like this, the stigma a certain morality puts on such things stops a lot of people from speaking honestly about the issue in a public forum.
Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:214, old post ID:2347