William

Controversial topics such as politics, religion, news that turns controversial etc
Locked
User avatar
MrSelf
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:01 pm

William

Post by MrSelf »

William Wallace wrote: Because there was NOTHING to finish.  The Iraqis did not put out a plea for help.  If they did, show it to me.
Desert Storm I. The one where a crazy dictator invaded another country 'to keep his military busy' (his own word) or too increase his oil supply and the UN got involved with Resolution 660, and esp 678. When something like that happens, you don't just let the ruler return to rule to harm him own people, and thats exactly what happen. There has been much resentment from Iraqis that they were not liberated and many murdered. I doubt there is an official plea, those Iraqis would have been killed if they had. Surely you are aware of what he and his inner circle did to so many people?
President Bush declared a ceasefire and on February 27. A peace conference was held in allied-occupied Iraq. At the conference, Iraq negotiated use of armed helicopters on their side of the temporary border. Soon after, these helicopters, and much of the Iraqi armed forces, were refocused toward fighting against a Shiite uprising in the south. In the North, Kurdish leaders took heart in American statements that they would support a people's uprising, and began fighting, in the hopes of triggering a coup. However, when no American support was forthcoming, Iraqi generals remained loyal and brutally crushed the Kurdish troops. Millions of Kurds fled across the mountains to Kurdish areas of Turkey and Iran. These incidents would later result in no-fly zones in both the North and the South.
And while he was killing his people, where was the UN? Passes more resolutions they wouldn't back up and skimming money from the food for oil program...

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:465, old post ID:4036
Anonymous

William

Post by Anonymous »

MrSelf wrote: 1 Desert Storm I. The one where a crazy dictator invaded another country 'to keep his military busy' (his own word) or too increase his oil supply and the UN got involved with Resolution 660, and esp 678. When something like that happens, you don't just let the ruler return to rule to harm him own people, and thats exactly what happen. There has been much resentment from Iraqis that they were not liberated and many murdered. I doubt there is an official plea, those Iraqis would have been killed if they had. Surely you are aware of what he and his inner circle did to so many people?
2 And while he was killing his people, where was the UN? Passes more resolutions they wouldn't back up and skimming money from the food for oil program...
1. Vietnam again...

America is not the Police Squad of the world. There was NO NEED for them to have intervened. In my humble opinion the UN had a right to do what they did. Read the Resolutions carefully.

MrSelf, why do you have this grand idea of the US being the Hero for all the other countries? It's that same behaviour that started Vietnam and caused them to have to pull out. Same with Desert Storm, which had only managed to embarrass George W. Senior.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:465, old post ID:4157
Cicero
Posts: 1056
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:20 am

William

Post by Cicero »

why do you have this grand idea of the US being the Hero for all the other countries?
Somebody has to look after us because the number of countries willing to stand up for themselves is decreasing.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:465, old post ID:4199
History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.
Sir Winston Churchill
User avatar
MrSelf
Posts: 2882
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 8:01 pm

William

Post by MrSelf »

-> MrSelf, why do you have this grand idea of the US being the Hero for all the other countries?[/quote wrote: I don't, I due however believe in giving credit where credit is due. Veitnam was foolish, esp the way it was handled it once it started. There have been many bad events, but that doesn't cancel out the good. I do believe we should stay out a little more, freakin republicans are suppost to!
It's that same behaviour that started Vietnam and caused them to have to pull out.
Vietnam was an embarrasment. The political landspace of that time is, more or less, an embarrasment. No real arguement.
Same with Desert Storm, which had only managed to embarrass George W. Senior.
I'm not sure what you mean, DS was not really much of an embarrassment to the administration of the time, his lack of fiscal control was however.

<!--QuoteBegin-Cicero] Somebody has to look after us because the number of countries willing to stand up for themselves is decreasing.
:dance:
I agree we shouldn't be the police, but we can stand back and do nothing either.

When we do nothing, we are insulted for not helping, it happens all the time.
When we intervein, we are scolded for sticking our nose in. A bit hypocritical.

Archived topic from Anythingforums, old topic ID:465, old post ID:4207
Locked