burnus admin back

fuzzy · Post by **fuzzy** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:37 pm

why did he get it taken away? because people complained. what was tehre to complain about? he helps u get better at pvp. trust me i know from experience... he did alot to have fun. ran around luna as a aw? made littl event so we had stuff to do. in my opinion he was a good admn. made things fun and challenging when there wasnt much to do.

please vote i want poeples opinoins.

i want to hear ur side why he shouldnt be, as well with urs black. its the voice of the sahrd that says that we cannot have him... its like prom popular ppl say what goes on.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2549

Gaiava Arkkaza · Post by **Gaiava Arkkaza** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:40 pm

Eh, I wouldnt care if I attacked people first, but they were doing it. :/ Them again I should have kept my admin on [invul mode, but I cant test stuff like I want when i'm on it.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2550

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:43 pm

I liked Brunus as an admin. The only bad thing he did was kill me while I was AFK, but hell, the people who complain against him do the same thing to me as it is. So big deal. I mean, I should make a RPV someday, lol.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2551

Nosferatu · Post by **Nosferatu** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:54 pm

yes give him his adminship back

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2553

Death · Post by **Death** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:03 pm

He does a lot for the shard and has contributed greatly script wise so I think that he should keep his seer position. However, being a small shard and all, black might be looking to constraint the amount of staff members for the time being until the shard grows larger, so it's all up to him.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2557

fuzzy · Post by **fuzzy** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:06 pm

i understand that 100% but he was the first... he did alot ya.. but the voice of the sahrd got him kicked.. the people know who they are one is now a seer. im nto saying kick him. but burnus is fucken a nice guy and well work with u. no matter what. ppls voice got him out... maybe if the voice can get him back in....

i relaly wnat to talk to black aobvut this.. so far no one has voted no for him. i want to talk to black personally, so black if u get this pull me and we can talk

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2558

Lymus · Post by **Lymus** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:07 pm

I say at least make him a Seer.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2559

Red Squirrel · Post by **Red Squirrel** » Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:58 pm

Well everyone wants him back so I will set him back. It was more or less temp anyway because of a few things that got overreacted and I got complaints involving people wanting to leave the shard and I really can't afford that to happen.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2562

Finlander · Post by **Finlander** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 9:54 am

Brunus to seer

Edit: Seems iam bit late

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2573

Tom · Post by **Tom** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:21 pm

I always vote no on polls. I did not read it. However brunus is ok he killed me once but rezed me only problem was loss of fame and everyone knows how hard it is for you to get fame here with all those blue chickens just oozing of it. So let him have it back he did give me back my greater AOA when I got message that I earned a greater but got a crappy dual wall. However he gave me the worst greater in the game since I had 2 all ready hehehe. Later

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2576

Red Squirrel · Post by **Red Squirrel** » Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:48 pm

I've been experimenting with a new log searching method which works great. To ensure it works I was able to track down items which I knew already that they were GM edited (things like moongates for the duel arena, etc) and tbh Brunus hardly did anything illegal, we all over assumed things just because it so happened that some items ended up super ubber like rings with 7 maxed mods and such. I just saw some [set isbonded true to pets but thats before I talked to him about that stuff.

To give an idea of the detail in these logs:

Code: Select all

[root@borg runuo logs]# grep -B 2 -i 0x400ee819 *
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log-2/7/2007 7:15:54 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') used command 'add trashbarrel'
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log-2/7/2007 7:15:56 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') building at (973, 527, -50) in Malas: "trashbarrel"
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log:2/7/2007 7:15:56 PM: 208.101.68.178: Serials: 0x400EE819; 
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log-2/7/2007 7:16:15 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') used command 'set name "Crappy bods go here :)"'
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log:2/7/2007 7:16:16 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') set property 'name' of 0x400EE819 (TrashBarrel) to 'Crappy bods go here :)'
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log-2/7/2007 7:16:24 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') used command 'set hue 1150'
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log:2/7/2007 7:16:25 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') set property 'hue' of 0x400EE819 (TrashBarrel) to '1150'
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log-2/7/2007 7:16:27 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') used command 'dupe '
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log:2/7/2007 7:16:30 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') duping 0x400EE819 (TrashBarrel) (inBag=False; amount=1)
Sunday, February 04, 2007.log:2/7/2007 7:16:30 PM: 208.101.68.178: Owner 0x3 "Squirrel" ('root') duped 0x400EE819 (TrashBarrel) creating 0x400EE853 (TrashBarrel)
[root@borg runuo logs]#

There was some suspicious items someone told me about and I've checked them and they are legit.

Archived topic from AOV, old topic ID:468, old post ID:2606